|
|
Post by KingsOfKings on Mar 13, 2008 0:03:36 GMT -5
all I gotta say is that Brand's agent really hasn't been looking out for him very well...he's getting screwed over royally.
|
|
|
|
Post by dingles87 on Mar 13, 2008 12:01:13 GMT -5
Its not really fair to let guys walk, and when they do walk, they just re sign up with the team usually that they just left. how is it not fair to let guys walk? A portion of player re-signings are based on ratings like greed, loyalty, play for winner, and maybe other variables FBB takes into account. However, when a player based on those ratings decides to test FA, the league switches to a totally different standard for re-signings. How is this fair? Brand's situation is proof that your formula sometimes doesnt even come close to mimicking the contract demands in FBB. If a player wants to test FA (which is soooooo unfair), I would overwhelmingly support the idea of you just making a contract demand based on common sense (which waved bye bye to the formula) or what comparable players are making. And now for the biggest hole in your logic..... If you claim that most players choose to re-sign with their original team, then tell me what the harm is with letting them test FA. Why intervene with the game and use formulas when all contract demands and offers could be evaluated by the same standard (FBB) and chances are good that the player will return to his team? |
|
|
|
Post by dingles87 on Mar 15, 2008 11:31:05 GMT -5
what? no rebuttal?
|
|
|
|
Post by NBL Commish on Mar 16, 2008 0:59:25 GMT -5
nope, im done giving my two cents about this, if the formula is decided to change I will let the whole league know ahead of time, till that time comes its gonna remain this way.
|
|
