|
Post by virginiaunion3 on Dec 3, 2007 15:54:44 GMT -5
i like the ratings of my draft picks unlike someone else lol berger u did a great job on this
|
|
|
Post by nets on Dec 3, 2007 16:32:51 GMT -5
"Frye, Williams, Weaver, Pargo, Steele looks better than Frye, Lopez, Weaver, Wright, Steele IMO."
Bucks Quote
Three issues I have with the lineup you created for me for thr future. One you have no room for Kelenna Azubuike who is my starting SF. Two, I am undersized at center and shooting guard. Three, I have very little low post scoring.
My vision for 3 years out is Frye, Lopez, Azubuike, Weaver, Steele
To me this provides the best balance of inside scoing and outside scoring, I am left only being undersized at C but at PF, SF and SG I can go bigger which should make up for it. And Williams and Wright give me a legit bench.
Don't get me wrong, I would like to have Pargo but if I can draft between an out of position PG and a scoring C then I do the C again even now that I have the benefit of your input.
|
|
|
Post by gvlakers on Dec 3, 2007 17:29:34 GMT -5
Great job, I like my rating
|
|
|
Post by CHANGEME on Dec 3, 2007 17:53:17 GMT -5
Damn good article because you have 19 comments on it already
|
|
|
Post by Thaaa BUCKS! on Dec 3, 2007 17:59:08 GMT -5
"Frye, Williams, Weaver, Pargo, Steele looks better than Frye, Lopez, Weaver, Wright, Steele IMO." Bucks Quote Three issues I have with the lineup you created for me for thr future. One you have no room for Kelenna Azubuike who is my starting SF. Two, I am undersized at center and shooting guard. Three, I have very little low post scoring. My vision for 3 years out is Frye, Lopez, Azubuike, Weaver, Steele To me this provides the best balance of inside scoing and outside scoring, I am left only being undersized at C but at PF, SF and SG I can go bigger which should make up for it. And Williams and Wright give me a legit bench. Don't get me wrong, I would like to have Pargo but if I can draft between an out of position PG and a scoring C then I do the C again even now that I have the benefit of your input. Well you know what, you've now proven to me that what you did was better than what I thought you should have.
|
|
|
Post by nets on Dec 3, 2007 19:01:52 GMT -5
And vice versa.
I still like the article I just don't agree with your assessment.
At least it brought on an interesting debate.
Since my starting 5 is likely not to include the guy you wanted me to draft or the guy that I did draft I wonder how many people think the best talent available was Pargo and how many feel it was Lopez.
|
|
|
Post by Sonics GM on Dec 3, 2007 20:12:38 GMT -5
Damn good article because you have 19 comments on it already ya I wish my articles got comments like that
|
|
|
Post by Thaaa BUCKS! on Dec 3, 2007 20:48:19 GMT -5
Which makes Ryan > Drew
|
|
|
Post by virginiaunion3 on Dec 3, 2007 21:24:53 GMT -5
haha
|
|
|
Post by Sonics GM on Dec 4, 2007 2:12:04 GMT -5
Which makes Ryan > Drew oh dont get to overconfident buddy haha
|
|
|
Post by NBL President on Dec 11, 2007 17:47:09 GMT -5
4 for this article, it's tough to grade everything.
|
|
|
Post by CHANGEME on Dec 11, 2007 20:16:02 GMT -5
Maybe it's just me, but this article means enough to the league that, to encourage it again, 5 or 6 ATC's instead?
|
|
|
Post by NBL President on Dec 11, 2007 21:48:54 GMT -5
I'm good with 5, that's fine.
|
|
|
Post by Thaaa BUCKS! on Dec 11, 2007 21:49:28 GMT -5
Woo
|
|